Preservation edition · October 3, 2026 · Geekenstein Editorial
Historical source: David Rhinehart, October 12, 2012. This edition contains a newly written, condensed account of the original coverage, with historical opinions attributed to their author. It is not the original article or a new firsthand review.
The PlayStation 3 review
Rhinehart reviewed Borderlands 2 on PlayStation 3 after spending considerable time with the first game and its expansions in cooperative play. His October 12, 2012 review praised the sequel as an expansion and refinement of that formula. The product panel also listed Xbox 360 and PC, but those were not the version identified as reviewed.
Writing and the world of Pandora
The reviewer enjoyed Anthony Burch’s writing and thought the story gave the returning characters greater significance. He welcomed the emotional moments and finale while acknowledging that the pervasive humor could be a substantial obstacle for readers who disliked it. He also valued the variety of icy, sandy and cavern environments and the stronger sense of a connected world.
Weapons, classes and replaying the campaign
Manufacturer-specific weapon behaviors were a major improvement in his assessment. He discussed Jakobs’ distinctive firing style, Maliwan’s elemental effects and Tediore’s thrown-weapon reloads as examples of guns differing in more than numerical strength. New classes and the Badass system’s character-spanning stat rewards encouraged him to experiment with different approaches.
What interrupted the momentum
Rhinehart objected to repeatedly returning to previously visited locations for new quests. He sometimes found solo encounters overwhelming, though he praised the diversity and behavior of enemies. An easier final boss did not substantially weaken his response to the story’s climax. These observations concern the original reviewed version and do not establish the behavior of later editions.
The historical recommendation
His verdict strongly favored the sequel’s loot-driven combat and cooperative appeal. A later Geekenstein writer took a different view of the series’ emotional direction in the Tiny Tina essay. The two pieces address different releases and retain their respective authors’ opinions.
Preservation source and omissions
The historical article container was recovered from a Common Crawl capture dated 2017-08-22. The full original prose, author biography, advertisements and third-party media are not republished. Archive availability alone does not grant reuse rights. The original publication date is shown only where verified.
Common Crawl source file (compressed archive record; capture timestamp 20170822070118).